ORBIT-USER: Change CWMAX

[Sachin]

I was using throughput.. so you are right ..
Thats why I was unsure whether it was implementation or just a manifestation
of the metric selected


On 3/28/07, Haris Kremo <harisk at winlab.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>
> Sachin,
>
> what's the metric you've been using to determine whether CWmax works?
>
> The theory (you know who...) claims that changing CWmax does not
> affect much saturation throughput - which sounds reasonable. However,
> the average number of retries per packet should change a lot,
> especially for a large number of nodes.
>
> H.
>
> On 3/28/07, Johannes Berg <johannes at sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 10:52 -0400, Sachin wrote:
> >
> > > CWMin seemed to work (in powers of two only)
> >
> > That "powers of two" can be expected, I've seen implementations of the
> > random generation that do CWMin = 2^N-1, cw = (cwmin & random)
> >
> > johannes
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://orbit-lab.org/pipermail/orbit-user/attachments/20070328/1cf05508/attachment.htm