ORBIT-USER: ORBIT Node kernel version

[Sachin Ganu]

We have 2.6.12 in our baseline image..

On 9/25/06, Arinto Murdopo <arinto at gmail.com> wrote:
> How about for the kernel itself? I think I need to develop my protocol in
> the same kernel version as ORBIT node.. I'm afraid my protocol would not be
> able to run smoothly if developing kernel is different from ORBIT node's
> kernel version.
>
> Thank you for your attention
>
> arinto
>
>
> On 9/26/06, Sachin Ganu <sachin at winlab.rutgers.edu > wrote:
> > Hi Arinto,
> >
> > As ORBIT users, we would ideally like a debian package that can be
> > simply apt-get installed. However, we are currently not averse to you
> > having your own hard disk images given the tradeoff between the time
> > it takes for the debianization and the convenience of using custom
> > images.
> >
> > One example you can look at is the OTG code's Makefile .. its fairly
> > easy to adapt that to create your own binary Debian package for your
> > app.
> >
> > On 9/24/06, Arinto Murdopo < arinto at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Dear All
> > >
> > > If I want to develop some protocol and in the end I'll upload it to
> ORBIT,
> > > which kernel version I should use? The latest stable kernel in
> kernel.org is
> > > version 2.6.18. Is that ok if using this kernel?
> > >
> > > Which one is easier and more reliable, imaging the whole OS image to the
> > > node so the protocol will be installed with the OS where it is developed
> OR
> > > make the protocol as an application under Debian linux so we can install
> in
> > > Debian node using apt feature of Debian? Anyone has experience this
> before?
> > > Maybe you can share your experience and suggestion
> > >
> > > Thank you for your help and attention
> > >
> > > arinto
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>