ORBIT-USER: ORBIT Node kernel version

[Luis R. Rodriguez]

At the moment orbit is designed so you can only use the images we have
or you save; you use them the usual imageNodes process. If you want
the latest wireless kernel development tree yourself just:

cg-clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-dev.git

  Luis

On 10/3/06, Arinto Murdopo <arinto at gmail.com> wrote:
> Okie, where can I download the baseline image?
>
> Thank you
>
> arinto
>
>
> On 10/4/06, Luis R. Rodriguez < mcgrof at gmail.com > wrote:
> > Arinto,
> >
> > For anything that has to do with linux wireless development you should
> > be using our wireless development images or your own. Linux is under
> > heavy wireless development right now so bleeding edge is the way to go
> > as otherwise you'd miss out on patches for fixes, additions and API
> > changes. This specially holds true if you wish to eventually submit
> > your protocol upstream. Patches for additions of new protocols should
> > always be based on the latest and greatest.
> >
> > The list of supported images is always available at:
> >
> > http://orbit-lab.org/wiki/Documentation/SupportedImages
> >
> > If you use these you'll also get kernel debugging as a perk ;)
> >
> >   Luis
> >
> > On 9/26/06, Sachin Ganu <sachin at winlab.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> > > We have 2.6.12 in our baseline image
> > >
> > > On 9/25/06, Arinto Murdopo < arinto at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > How about for the kernel itself? I think I need to develop my protocol
> in
> > > > the same kernel version as ORBIT node.. I'm afraid my protocol would
> not be
> > > > able to run smoothly if developing kernel is different from ORBIT
> node's
> > > > kernel version.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your attention
> > > >
> > > > arinto
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 9/26/06, Sachin Ganu < sachin at winlab.rutgers.edu > wrote:
> > > > > Hi Arinto,
> > > > >
> > > > > As ORBIT users, we would ideally like a debian package that can be
> > > > > simply apt-get installed. However, we are currently not averse to
> you
> > > > > having your own hard disk images given the tradeoff between the time
> > > > > it takes for the debianization and the convenience of using custom
> > > > > images.
> > > > >
> > > > > One example you can look at is the OTG code's Makefile .. its fairly
> > > > > easy to adapt that to create your own binary Debian package for your
> > > > > app.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/24/06, Arinto Murdopo < arinto at gmail.com > wrote:
> > > > > > Dear All
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I want to develop some protocol and in the end I'll upload it
> to
> > > > ORBIT,
> > > > > > which kernel version I should use? The latest stable kernel in
> > > > kernel.org is
> > > > > > version 2.6.18. Is that ok if using this kernel?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Which one is easier and more reliable, imaging the whole OS image
> to the
> > > > > > node so the protocol will be installed with the OS where it is
> developed
> > > > OR
> > > > > > make the protocol as an application under Debian linux so we can
> install
> > > > in
> > > > > > Debian node using apt feature of Debian? Anyone has experience
> this
> > > > before?
> > > > > > Maybe you can share your experience and suggestion
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you for your help and attention
> > > > > >
> > > > > > arinto
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>